Cases
Neighbours and planning
A
- Abbahall Ltd v Smee
- Allen v Greenwood
- Amec Developments Ltd v Jury's Hotel Management (UK) Ltd
- American Cyanamid Co v Ethicon Ltd
- Andreae v Selfridge and Co. Ltd
- Andrews v Waite
- Ankerson v Connelly
- Arenson v Casson Beckman Rutley & Co
- Asquith v Griffen
- Austin Rover Group Ltd v Crouch Butler Savage Associates
- Aynsley v Glover
B
- Barnes v Allen
- Barnes v Loach
- Barry v Minturn
- Bernstein v Skyviews
- Birmingham, Dudley and District Banking Co v Ross
- Bland v Moseley Trinity
- Blue Town Investments Ltd v Higgs and Hill plc
- Bower v Peate
- Bowring Services Ltd v Scottish Widows Fund and Life Assurance Society
- Brace v South East Regional Housing Association Ltd
- Bracewell v Appleby
- Bradburn v Lindsay
- Bridle v Ruby
- Broomfield v Williams
- Buckinghamshire County Council v Moran
- Bullers v Dickinson
- Burkett Sharp & Co v Eastcheap Dried Fruit Co
- Burlington Property Company Ltd v Odeon Theatres Ltd
- Burton v Winters
- Butcher Robinson & Staples Ltd v London Regional Transport
- Byard v Co-operative Permanent Building Society Ltd
C
- Carlish v Salt
- Carr-Saunders v Dick McNeil Associates
- CDC2020 Plc v Ferreira
- Celsteel Ltd v Alton House Holdings
- Chamber Colliery Company v Hopwood
- Charles Semon & Co v Bradford Corporation
- Chartered Society of Physiotherapy v Simmonds Church Smiles
- Cheltenham and Gloucester Building Society v Ricketts
- Clifford v Holt
- Collis v Laugher
- Colls v Home and Colonial Stores
- Consignia plc v Russell Sealy
- Cooper v Straker
- Courtauld v Legh
- Cowper v Laidler
- Crofts v Haldane
D
E
F
- Farrs Lane Development Ltd, R (on the application of) v Bristol Magistrates Court
- Fishenden v Higgs and Hill Ltd
- Forsyth-Grant v Allen
- Foster v Warblington UDC
- Frances Holland School v Wassef
- Frederick Betts Ltd v Pickfords Ltd
- Freetown Ltd v Assethold Ltd
- Frogmore Developments Ltd v Shirayama Shokusan Company Ltd and Others
G
H
I
K
L
- Labalmondiere v Addison
- Lambeth London Borough Council v Jack Blackburn
- Lane v O'Brien Homes Ltd
- Langbrook Properties Ltd v Surrey County Council
- Lawrence v Obee
- Leachman v L & K Richardson Ltd
- Leadbetter v Marylebone Corporation
- Lehmann v Herman
- Lemaitre v Davis
- Levet v Gas Light and Coke Company
- London, Gloucestershire and North Hants Dairy Co v Morley & Lanceley
- Loost v Kremer
- Lord Battersea v Commissioners of Sewers for the City of London
- Louis v Sadiq
- Lunn Poly Ltd v Liverpool & Lancashire Properties Ltd
- Lyme Valley Squash Club Ltd v Newcastle under Lyme BC
M
- Manu v Euroview Estates Ltd
- Marchant v Capital & Counties plc
- Marine and General Mutual Life Assurance Society v St James' Real Estate Co Ltd
- Markfield Investments Ltd v Evans
- Marlborough (West End) Ltd v Wilks Head and Eve
- Mason v Fulham Corporation
- Midtown Ltd v City of London Real Property Company Ltd; Joseph and others v City of London Real Property Co Ltd
- Mills v Silver & Others
- Minting v Ramage
- Mitchell v Cantrill
- Moore v Rawson
- Morgan v Fear
- Mortimer v Bailey
- Mucelli v Albania
- Myers v Catterson
N
- National Justice Compania Naviera SA v Prudential Assurance Co Ltd: The Ikarian Reefer
- National Provincial Plate Glass Insurance Co Ltd v Prudential Assurance Co
- Neilson v Poole
- Newnham v Willison
- News of the World Ltd v Allen Fairhead & Sons Ltd
- North Eastern Co-operative Society Ltd v Newcastle Upon Tyne City Council
- Nottingham Building Society v Eurodynamics Systems
O
P
R
- R(on the application of Castelli) v Merton LBC
- Ray v Fairway Motors (Barnstaple) Ltd
- Ray v Hazeldine
- Reading v Barnard
- Rees v Skerrett
- Re London Tilbury and Southend Railway Company and Trustees of Gower's Walk Schools
- Re Sharpe
- Re Stone and Hastie
- Richardson v Graham
- Riley Gowler Ltd v National Heart Hospital Board of Governors
- Roberts v Macord
- Roswell v Prior
- Ruscoe v Grounsell
- Russell v Watts
- R v City of London Corporation and Royal Mutual Insurance Society ex parte Master and Governors and Commonalty of the Mystery of the Barbers of London
- R v Rosewell
- Ryppon v Bowles
S
- Salvage Wharf Ltd v G & S Brough Ltd
- Savill Bros. Ltd v Bethell
- Scarfe v Adams
- Scott v Pape
- Sedleigh-Denfield v O'Callaghan
- Seef v Ho
- Selby v Whitbread
- Sheffield Masonic Hall Co Ltd v Sheffield Corporation
- Sheffield Masonic Hall Company Ltd v Sheffield Corporation
- Shelfer v City of London Electric Lighting Co
- Simmons v Dobson
- Slack v Leeds Industrial Co-operative Society Ltd
- Smith & Co (Orpington) v Morris
- Smith v Baxter
- Smith v Brudenell-Bruce
- Solomons v R Gertzenstein Ltd
- Spiers & Son Ltd v Troup
- Staight v Burn
- Stanton v Jones
- St Edmundsbury and Ipswich Diocesan Board of Finance v Clarke (No. 2)
- Stephens v Anglian Water Authority
- St John's Church, Bishop's Hatfield
- Stokes v Cambridge Corporation
- Stokoe v Singers
- Sturges v Bridgman
- Suffield v Brown
T
V
W
- Weston v Arnold
- WH Bailey & Son Ltd v Holborn & Frascati Ltd
- Wheaton v Maple & Co
- Wheeldon v Burrows
- Wiggington & Milner Ltd v Winster Engineering Ltd
- William Cory & Son Ltd v City of London Real Property Company Ltd
- Williams & Anor v Sandy Lane (Chester) Ltd
- Williams v Usherwood
- Willoughby v Eckstein
- Woodhouse v Consolidated Property Corporation Ltd
- Wrotham Park Estate Co Ltd v Parkside Homes Ltd