Spiro v Lintern
This document is only available with a paid isurv subscription.
[1973] 3 All ER 391 Estate agency The plaintiff believed that the defendant's wife had authority to authorise an agent to enter into a contract of sale of a house. The defendant, the sole beneficial owner of the house, had not given his wife such authority...Explore the subscription options here to get full access to isurv, including downloads.
Try isurv for 1 month!
You can now get unlimited access to all isurv channels with our 1-month pass, available for only £39. To find out more, enquire with our team using our form.
Sign up for the isurv newsletter to receive a monthly round-up of the latest isurv updates.
For further support, please contact us by emailing isurv@rics.org or calling +44 (0) 247 686 8584