Karling v Purdue
This document is only available with a paid isurv subscription.
[2004] ScotCS 221; Expert witness In an action by a previously accused person in criminal proceedings against a pathologist responsible for flawed Crown evidence, the court considered the scope of an expert's immunity from suit. The following principles would apply generally: ...Explore the subscription options here to get full access to isurv, including downloads.
Try isurv for 1 month!
You can now get unlimited access to all isurv channels with our 1-month pass, available for only £39. To find out more, enquire with our team using our form.
Sign up for the isurv newsletter to receive a monthly round-up of the latest isurv updates.
For further support, please contact us by emailing isurv@rics.org or calling +44 (0) 247 686 8584