Day v Ost
This document is only available with a paid isurv subscription.
[1973] 2 NZLR 385
Contract adminsitration
The New Zealand Supreme Court
considered an allegation that an architect had assumed a duty of care to a
subcontractor by giving him an assurance that he would be paid by the employer.
The plaintiff, a block-laying and
plastering subcontractor,...
Explore the subscription options here to get full access to isurv, including downloads.
Try isurv for 1 month!
You can now get unlimited access to all isurv channels with our 1-month pass, available for only £39. To find out more, enquire with our team using our form.
Sign up for the isurv newsletter to receive a monthly round-up of the latest isurv updates.
For further support, please contact us by emailing isurv@rics.org or calling +44 (0) 247 686 8584