Day v Ost

This document is only available with a paid isurv subscription.

[1973] 2 NZLR 385 Contract adminsitration The New Zealand Supreme Court considered an allegation that an architect had assumed a duty of care to a subcontractor by giving him an assurance that he would be paid by the employer. The plaintiff, a block-laying and plastering subcontractor,...

Explore the subscription options here to get full access to isurv, including downloads.

Try isurv for 1 month!

You can now get unlimited access to all isurv channels with our 1-month pass, available for only £39. To find out more, enquire with our team using our form.

Sign up for the isurv newsletter to receive a monthly round-up of the latest isurv updates.

For further support, please contact us by emailing isurv@rics.org or calling +44 (0) 247 686 8584