Clay v Crump
This document is only available with a paid isurv subscription.
[1963] 3 WLR 866
Contract administration
The defendant architect was
employed to supervise a demolition and building operation. The demolition
contractors left a wall in an unsafe condition. The architect should have known
it was unsafe, but he failed to examine it properly and instructed that it
should be left...
Explore the subscription options here to get full access to isurv, including downloads.
Try isurv for 1 month!
You can now get unlimited access to all isurv channels with our 1-month pass, available for only £39. To find out more, enquire with our team using our form.
Sign up for the isurv newsletter to receive a monthly round-up of the latest isurv updates.
For further support, please contact us by emailing isurv@rics.org or calling +44 (0) 247 686 8584