Alexander Corfield v David Grant
This document is only available with a paid isurv subscription.
(1992) 59 BLR 102 Contract administration When considering the question of what was sufficient supervision for the architect to have undertaken, the judge said that it should be asked 'whether it was enough ... The proof of the pudding is in the eating. Was the attention given enough for...Explore the subscription options here to get full access to isurv, including downloads.
Try isurv for 1 month!
You can now get unlimited access to all isurv channels with our 1-month pass, available for only £39. To find out more, enquire with our team using our form.
Sign up for the isurv newsletter to receive a monthly round-up of the latest isurv updates.
For further support, please contact us by emailing isurv@rics.org or calling +44 (0) 247 686 8584