Trinidad Asphalt Co. v Ambard
This document is only available with a paid isurv subscription.
(1899) Easements The respondents dug out their own land to exploit asphalt deposits lying underneath it. A consequence of this was that asphalt lying under the adjacent land belonging to the appellants oozed into the respondents' land, causing subsidence to the appellants' land. The Privy Council considered that asphaltum was...Explore the subscription options here to get full access to isurv, including downloads.
Try isurv for 1 month!
You can now get unlimited access to all isurv channels with our 1-month pass, available for only £39. To find out more, enquire with our team using our form.
Sign up for the isurv newsletter to receive a monthly round-up of the latest isurv updates.
For further support, please contact us by emailing isurv@rics.org or calling +44 (0) 247 686 8584