Value for Money (VfM) from a public-sector perspective

This document is only available with a paid isurv subscription.

Traditionally procured projects and public–private partnership projects have different strengths and weaknesses.  For example, traditionally procured projects that use public financing from credit-worthy governments generally have lower borrowing costs compared to the cost of capital for PPP projects. On the other hand, cost and schedule overruns risks for large-scale infrastructure projects are...

Explore the subscription options here to get full access to isurv, including downloads.

Try isurv for 1 month!

You can now get unlimited access to all isurv channels with our 1-month pass, available for only £39. To find out more, enquire with our team using our form.

Sign up for the isurv newsletter to receive a monthly round-up of the latest isurv updates.

For further support, please contact us by emailing isurv@rics.org or calling +44 (0) 247 686 8584